The problem
Saturn’s main rings contain little non-icy material, but when did the rings themselves form? An exposure age inferred from contamination depends on incoming dust, retention and cleaning. If dust simply accumulated in a known, unchanging ring mass, its fraction could act as a clock. Loss, recycling or changing mass can break that inference. Ring structures and orbital evolution provide other clocks, which need not date the same event.[1] [2]
Scope
The formation age of Saturn’s main rings, distinguished from exposure, structural and dynamical ages.
What remains open
Why it matters
The rings may preserve early material or record a later disruption of a moon. Their age changes how we reconstruct the history of Saturn’s satellites.[1]
Spreading ring material can build moons, while disruption of a satellite can create rings. Distinguishing these directions of material transfer requires a history consistent with both ring composition and the satellite system. Dating one visible structure alone cannot decide that history.[1]
Definitions
2 terms
exposure age
A time inferred from the effects of exposure, such as accumulated non-icy material. It need not equal the time when Saturn’s main rings formed.[1]
Sources
- The Age and Origin of Saturn’s Rings
Notes on The Age and Origin of Saturn’s Rings
Review distinguishes competing clocks and evaluates young and ancient ring histories.
- Saturn's rings age I.: Reconsideration of the exposure age
Notes on Saturn's rings age I.: Reconsideration of the exposure age
Accepted manuscript, subsequently in Icarus 452; revises exposure estimates using impact and cleaning models.