The problem
Can every fraction , for a whole number of at least 2, be split into exactly three fractions whose numerators are 1? For example, . The denominators must be positive whole numbers, but they may repeat: . The conjecture says some three-term split works for every eligible .[1]
Can a fixed three-term bound represent using unit fractions for every positive integer denominator ? The required equation is
The values of may depend on and need not be distinct. For , the denominators work. Clearing denominators gives , a polynomial equation whose positive integer solutions are required separately for each . A four-term sum of is immediate and does not settle this stricter bound.[1]
Scope
For every integer n ≥ 2, the universal statement 4/n = 1/a + 1/b + 1/c for positive integers a, b and c. Repeated denominators are allowed.
What remains open
Many cases work. No proof covers every n.[1]
The checked 2026 prime-denominator criterion concerns a particular representation type. It does not settle every denominator; finite checks cannot supply the universal proof.[1]
Why it matters
Four terms are easy: add to itself four times. Requiring just three turns that trivial construction into an open question about whole-number denominators. A proof would show that the shorter representation always exists; a counterexample would reveal where this simple compression fails.[1]
The problem isolates how an integer constraint can obstruct shortening a rational decomposition. Its target is uniform in , even though the denominators are allowed to change with each input. A solution would explain whether special-case constructions can always be extended to a three-term representation, or whether some denominator has a genuine obstruction.[1]
Definitions
Sources
- The Erdős–Straus Conjecture and the Structure of Primes
Notes on The Erdős–Straus Conjecture and the Structure of Primes
States the full three-unit-fraction conjecture and proves a criterion for a restricted type of prime-denominator representation.