Genome size evolution

Still openEvidence checked

Subjects: Genetics · Evolution

Collections: Genes and development · Genomes and inheritance

Reading depth

The problem

An onion’s genome contains roughly sixteen billion DNA letters in one chromosome set; much of its assembled sequence consists of repeats. More DNA does not simply mean more kinds of protein-making instructions. How do genomes gain so much material, and what determines whether it stays or is lost over evolution?[1] [3]

Scope

Relative contributions of DNA gain, deletion, selection and genetic drift to eukaryotic genome-size evolution, especially noncoding and repetitive DNA.

What remains open

Repeated DNA explains much expansion. The forces deciding what is retained or lost remain incomplete.[1]

Why it matters

DNA amount is part of how a cell stores and copies its inherited material, not a ranking of how complex an organism is. Explaining its variation connects the history of repeats and gene organization to the evolutionary forces acting on them.[1]

Definitions

3 terms
transposable element

A DNA sequence able to move to a new genomic location or generate additional copies. Some types expand genomes by copying themselves.[1]

genetic drift

Changes in variant frequencies due to chance sampling across generations, rather than differences in reproductive success caused by the variants.[1] [2]

effective population size

A population-genetic measure of the strength of random sampling, often inferred through proxies; it is not simply a head count of organisms.[1] [2]

Sources

  1. Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions Julie Blommaert · 2020-08-26
    Notes on Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions

    Review distinguishes DNA gains and losses from the evolutionary forces affecting their retention. Repeats, gene counts and genome amount are different quantities; observed genome-size diversity cannot simply rank organism complexity.

  2. Effective population size does not explain long-term variation in genome size and transposable element content in animals Alba Marino and colleagues · 2025-07-18
    Notes on Effective population size does not explain long-term variation in genome size and transposable element content in animals

    Version-of-record analysis combines an 807-species animal compilation with metric-specific subsets to test population-size proxies. Its general result challenges a long-term drift-based explanation without excluding drift in particular lineages. July 18, 2025 identifies this published version, following earlier reviewed preprints.

  3. Insights from the first genome assembly of Onion (Allium cepa) Richard Finkers and colleagues · 2021-07-13
    Notes on Insights from the first genome assembly of Onion (Allium cepa)

    Onion assembly provides a concrete example of a roughly 16-billion-letter genome and extensive repetitive assembled sequence. Estimated total genome size and assembled sequence length differ; this case does not equate DNA amount with protein-coding gene number.

Related problems

Suggest a correction