Landau’s constant

Still openEvidence checked

Subjects: Complex analysis

Reading depth

The problem

Imagine a map that bends a round input region and may send different points to the same output. If its local stretching at the center is fixed to one, how large a round disk must appear somewhere in the image? Landau asks for the best guarantee over all such holomorphic maps of the unit disk. The covered disk need not have a one-to-one inverse patch.[1] [2]

Scope

Exact classical Landau image-disk constant for holomorphic f on the unit disk with f′(0)=1; distinct from Bloch’s univalent-disk constant.

What remains open

The exact guaranteed radius is unknown. A carefully chosen example gives an upper candidate about 0.543259; universal lower estimates do not reach it. Computing that candidate to more digits does not close the inequality.[1] [2]

Why it matters

A derivative describes behavior near one point, yet here it forces coverage of an entire round region. Every point in that output disk must be attainable, even if the map folds elsewhere or gives a point several preimages. Fixing the local scale matters: without it, simply shrinking the identity map would destroy any common positive-radius guarantee.[1] [2]

Research directions

1 direction to explore

Definitions

2 terms
holomorphic

Complex differentiable at every point of an open region. Such a map may still send distinct inputs to the same output; holomorphic does not mean globally one-to-one.[1]

infimum

The greatest lower bound of a collection of values. Here it describes the worst universal disk-radius guarantee across all allowed maps; an individual map may cover a much larger disk.[1] [2]

Sources

Partial results
Markus Faulhuber, Anupam Gumber and Irina Shafkulovska

The candidate has an exact cubic AGM identity. Scope: L₊, the conjectured sharp value, not the unknown infimum L.

Does not establish a matching universal lower bound.

Source date: 2025-01-22§4.7 proves ag₃(∛2,1)=2 L₊.Read the source ↗
Md Firoz Ali and Shaesta Azim

Classical estimates are distinguished from meromorphic results. Scope: Normalized holomorphic image-disk L versus pole-class variants.

Refuted or solved meromorphic variants are not the proposed problem.

Source date: 2026-03-05Introduction supplies current classical bounds.Read the source ↗
  1. Bloch and Landau constants for meromorphic functions Md Firoz Ali and Shaesta Azim · 2026-03-05
    Notes on Bloch and Landau constants for meromorphic functions

    Provides normalized holomorphic definition and explicit known bounds; new meromorphic achievements do not solve classical L.

  2. The AGM of Gauss, Ramanujan’s corresponding theory, and spectral bounds of self-adjoint operators Markus Faulhuber, Anupam Gumber and Irina Shafkulovska · 2025-01-22
    Notes on The AGM of Gauss, Ramanujan’s corresponding theory, and spectral bounds of self-adjoint operators

    Verifies candidate Γ(1/3)Γ(5/6)/Γ(1/6) and preserves its conjectural sharpness.

Suggest a correction