Latitudinal diversity gradient

Still openEvidence checked

Subjects: Ecology

Collections: Ecosystems and their environment

Reading depth

The problem

Imagine making plant lists in regions near the equator and farther toward the poles. Many groups have more species near the equator, though oceanic-island plants show important exceptions. What histories produce the broad pattern and its exceptions? A region gains species when new ones form or arrive, and loses them when populations disappear; today's count does not tell us which process dominated.[1] [2]

Scope

Explaining variation in species richness with latitude, including exceptions and changes through geological history.

What remains open

Several processes can create similar patterns. Their importance differs between groups and environments.[1]

Why it matters

A species map contains a history of how life spread and diversified. Island plants also raise a practical biological distinction: reaching suitable weather need not be enough for a plant that depends on an absent pollinator or root partner.[1] [2] [3]

Definitions

2 terms
Species richness

The number of species in a defined place or group. Comparing counts requires specifying that place and group; richness does not measure how abundant each species is.[1] [2]

Mutualism

An interaction in which partners benefit one another. Dependence on a particular partner can make establishment difficult if that partner is absent.[2] [3]

Sources

  1. Explanations for latitudinal diversity gradients must invoke rate variation Source
    Notes on Explanations for latitudinal diversity gradients must invoke rate variation

    Perspective relates regional richness to species formation, extinction, dispersal and local loss. It supports distinguishing processes and histories; the page does not claim one universally established cause.

  2. Mutualisms weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands Source
    Notes on Mutualisms weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands

    Primary flora analysis compares observed island richness with model-estimated mainland richness and proposes a role for mutualistic partners. A later preprint critique and author response debate its statistical support; the page treats the mechanism as proposed and group-bound.

  3. Is there a robust effect of mainland mutualism rates on species richness of oceanic islands? Maximilian Pichler and Florian Hartig · 2024-11-22
    Notes on Is there a robust effect of mainland mutualism rates on species richness of oceanic islands?

    Version 1 critique reports a reanalysis questioning support for the island-mutualism attribution. The author read its primary abstract/history; neither its detailed models nor a definitive refutation are certified.

  4. Response to comment on Mutualism weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands Camille Delavaux, Thomas Crowther, James Bever and Evan Gora · 2025-05-27
    Notes on Response to comment on Mutualism weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands

    Version 1 response defends the original interpretation and challenges the critique. Its primary abstract/history establishes continued disagreement, not a resolved statistical or biological mechanism.

Suggest a correction