The problem
Imagine making plant lists in regions near the equator and farther toward the poles. Many groups have more species near the equator, though oceanic-island plants show important exceptions. What histories produce the broad pattern and its exceptions? A region gains species when new ones form or arrive, and loses them when populations disappear; today's count does not tell us which process dominated.[1] [2]
A tropical region can have a rich plant list while an oceanic island has far fewer species than a model predicts for a mainland region at that latitude. Which histories produce the broad rise in richness toward the equator, and which produce exceptions? Regional counts reflect new species forming, species arriving, extinction and local disappearance; these processes must be distinguished over time. One proposed island mechanism is establishment failure: a plant may arrive without an essential partner in a mutually beneficial relationship, such as a pollinating animal or root-associated fungus. The 2024 study linked partner-dependent plants to the island deficit relative to its mainland model. This was not an experiment removing partners, and a reanalysis and author response dispute the robustness of that attribution.[1] [2] [3] [4]
Scope
Explaining variation in species richness with latitude, including exceptions and changes through geological history.
What remains open
Several processes can create similar patterns. Their importance differs between groups and environments.[1]
Why it matters
A species can disappear from one region without going extinct, and a region can gain species without any new species evolving there. Distinguishing those changes connects local biodiversity to the broader history of how lineages originated and spread.[1]
Definitions
Sources
- Explanations for latitudinal diversity gradients must invoke rate variation
Notes on Explanations for latitudinal diversity gradients must invoke rate variation
Perspective relates regional richness to species formation, extinction, dispersal and local loss. It supports distinguishing processes and histories; the page does not claim one universally established cause.
- Mutualisms weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands
Notes on Mutualisms weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands
Primary flora analysis compares observed island richness with model-estimated mainland richness and proposes a role for mutualistic partners. A later preprint critique and author response debate its statistical support; the page treats the mechanism as proposed and group-bound.
- Is there a robust effect of mainland mutualism rates on species richness of oceanic islands?
Notes on Is there a robust effect of mainland mutualism rates on species richness of oceanic islands?
Version 1 critique reports a reanalysis questioning support for the island-mutualism attribution. The author read its primary abstract/history; neither its detailed models nor a definitive refutation are certified.
- Response to comment on Mutualism weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands
Notes on Response to comment on Mutualism weaken the latitudinal diversity gradient among oceanic islands
Version 1 response defends the original interpretation and challenges the critique. Its primary abstract/history establishes continued disagreement, not a resolved statistical or biological mechanism.