The problem
Imagine a square street grid with a random travel time on each edge. A longer route can arrive first if its edges are quicker. With independent exponential times averaging one, how widely do fastest arrival times vary across fresh grids as the destination moves farther east? The conjectured variance grows as distance to the two-thirds power.[1] [2]
Scope
Undirected nearest-neighbor edges of Z² have independent exponential passage times of mean one. Tₙ is the minimum total edge time from (0,0) to (n,0).
What remains open
Lattice variance estimates leave the predicted exponent undetermined. The reported Riemannian improvement uses a smooth positive bounded field, rotational invariance and positive-correlation assumptions. Its bound is not a theorem about the independent exponential lattice model; neither are exact exponents in solvable last-passage settings.[1] [2]
Why it matters
The fastest route depends on the very delays being measured, so its uncertainty differs from adding delays along one fixed route. The problem tests how route choice shapes fluctuations in random spreading, and whether this simple model shares the scaling found in other growth models.[2]
Optimizing over paths couples a route to the random environment, so independent edge times do not make the chosen route’s cost a sum of independently selected delays. Quantifying the resulting fluctuations connects random metric geometry to the proposed universality of planar growth, beyond models with an exact solution.[2]
Definitions
2 terms
variance
The average squared deviation from a random quantity’s mean. Standard deviation is its square root, so a two-thirds variance power would correspond to a one-third standard-deviation power.[1] [2]
last-passage
A related optimization that maximizes accumulated random weights over specified paths, commonly directed ones. Exact fluctuation formulas in solvable versions do not prove the exponent for the undirected minimum-time model here.[2]
Sources
- Planar first-passage percolation times are not tight
Notes on Planar first-passage percolation times are not tight
Archived version of a 1994 chapter; defines the exponential lattice target and proves a logarithmic variance lower bound.
- Rotationally invariant first passage percolation: Breaking the n/log n Variance Barrier
Notes on Rotationally invariant first passage percolation: Breaking the n/log n Variance Barrier
Preprint reports a stronger upper bound for rotationally invariant Riemannian FPP, while explaining the lattice and exactly solvable model distinction.