The problem
A drumhead fixed along its edge has a sequence of vibration modes. Changing its outline changes their frequencies. Pólya’s conjecture predicts a simple lower limit for each mode using only the drumhead’s area and its position in the ordered list. Here the question concerns flat regions with a fixed edge; the eigenvalue is proportional to the square of the frequency.[1]
A drumhead with its edge fixed has standing-wave modes whose squared frequencies are proportional to its Laplacian eigenvalues. Doubling every length lowers each eigenvalue by a factor of four and multiplies area by four. The question is whether area sets a sharp lower bound for every mode, for every allowed outline, rather than only the high-frequency scale. In a unit square the standing-wave patterns sin(mπx)sin(nπy) have eigenvalues for positive integers m and n; the patterns (1,2) and (2,1) have the same eigenvalue and are counted separately.
For a bounded planar Lipschitz domain , let count Dirichlet eigenvalues strictly below t, with multiplicity. The target is , equivalently . The area term is the leading count in Weyl’s law. That term has a phase-space interpretation: combine positions in the region with vectors describing oscillation direction and spatial frequency. This continuum count does not enumerate the exact standing-wave modes. Scaling by s multiplies area by and eigenvalues by ; the proposed comparison therefore depends on shape after size is removed. The strict-below convention differs from the source’s count at a squared threshold and is stated here explicitly.[1] [2]
Scope
The planar Dirichlet part of Pólya’s conjecture for arbitrary bounded Lipschitz domains in R²; this page does not include the separate Neumann inequality.
What remains open
The prediction works for many shapes, including rectangles, disks and rings. No proof establishes it for every allowed planar shape and every mode. Knowing that very high modes approach the predicted scale is not enough to bound each mode from below.[1]
The 2026 annulus theorem handles the full family of planar annuli. The June 2026 ε-loss result yields k ≤ (1+ε)|Ω|λ_k/(4π) only above a domain- and ε-dependent threshold. Taking smaller ε does not remove the changing threshold or settle the low eigenvalues; a limiting argument cannot supply the exact bound for a fixed k. The all-domain, all-index planar Dirichlet inequality therefore remains the target.[1] [2]
Why it matters
It would reveal a sharp geometric rule shared by very different shapes. Area alone would constrain the entire sequence of fixed-edge vibrations, despite the spectrum’s sensitivity to the outline.[1]
This problem asks how accurately the phase-space volume underlying Weyl’s leading term controls a finite spectral count. Boundary effects and shape can change lower-order behavior without changing that volume. Understanding their sign and size well enough to obtain a universal sharp inequality would clarify the reach of geometric spectral comparison.[1] [2]
Research directions
1 direction to explore
The exact bound for every eigenvalue
Remove the ε-loss and the high-eigenvalue threshold for arbitrary bounded planar Lipschitz domains.
Definitions
2 terms
Dirichlet
Here the boundary condition fixes the vibrating membrane along its edge. Mathematically the eigenfunction is zero at the boundary; this is different from the Neumann boundary condition.[1]
eigenvalue
The number in the equation that relates a Laplacian acting on a vibration pattern to that same pattern. For fixed physical membrane parameters, it is proportional to the square of the mode’s frequency.[1]
Sources
Partial results
The planar Dirichlet conjecture holds for every annulus. Scope: Annuli, rather than arbitrary bounded planar domains.
A family theorem does not establish the universal domain statement.
Source date: 2026-02-09Theorem 1.1 proves the annular case in the revised primary paper.Read the source ↗Quantified Weyl bounds imply Pólya’s estimate up to a factor 1+ε at sufficiently high eigenvalues. Scope: Bounded Lipschitz domains; exact statements also hold for certain special classes.
Both the tolerance and threshold remain in the general-domain estimate.
Source date: 2026-06-12The primary abstract supplies the ε-loss inequality and an explicit threshold.Read the source ↗- Pólya’s conjecture for Dirichlet eigenvalues of annuli
Notes on Pólya’s conjecture for Dirichlet eigenvalues of annuli
The primary paper, revised February 9, 2026, states the planar Dirichlet inequality and proves it for all planar annuli; the introduction distinguishes previous tiling, disk and sector results.
- Pólya’s Conjecture Up to ε-loss and Quantitative Estimates for the Remainder of Weyl’s Law
Notes on Pólya’s Conjecture Up to ε-loss and Quantitative Estimates for the Remainder of Weyl’s Law
The publisher’s primary abstract gives a quantified high-eigenvalue bound with factor 1+ε for bounded Lipschitz domains, while separately treating exact special classes.