P versus NP
A proposed guest list can be checked against the rules. Does easy checking always come with an efficient way to find a list that works?
Within Computational complexity · Search all subjects
A proposed guest list can be checked against the rules. Does easy checking always come with an efficient way to find a list that works?
A special kind of constraint puzzle is predicted to remain hard even when almost all its rules can be satisfied.
Random choices help many algorithms run quickly. Can every efficient algorithm with a bounded error probability be replaced by an efficient deterministic one?
Can estimating a quantum system’s lowest energy remain computationally hard even when only a fixed amount of accuracy is required?
Can every computation that uses only logarithmic memory with nondeterministic choices be carried out using the same memory bound deterministically?
Can finding three integers with a specified additive relation be done faster than essentially quadratic time?
Can a fixed Boolean matrix answer a sequence of arriving vectors in truly subcubic total time when each answer is needed before the next vector arrives?
Does the linear-algebraic rank of a Boolean table control how many bits two people must exchange to evaluate an entry?
Given every output of a Boolean function, how hard is it to decide whether a small circuit can produce that table?
Can one exhibit propositional truths whose proofs must be superpolynomially long even in a flexible standard deductive system?
As satisfiability clauses become longer, does the best worst-case running-time exponent approach exhaustive search?
Does a quantum computer gain verification power when its certificate can be a quantum state rather than a classical string?
Can every polynomial described as a sum of efficiently computable terms itself be computed by a small arithmetic circuit?
Must a bounded low-degree polynomial that varies appreciably have an input bit with noticeable influence?
Does each additional level of alternating computational choices add power, forever?
Whenever yes answers have short efficiently checkable certificates, must no answers have them too?
Can one efficiently checkable proof system match every other system’s proof lengths within a polynomial factor?
Can the winner of every finite parity game be determined in polynomial time?
Can every problem solvable with polynomial memory also be solved in polynomial time?
Can a classical polynomial-time algorithm recognize all minimal hitting sets?
Can ordinary random labeled examples teach a DNF formula in polynomial time under the uniform distribution?
Can an algorithm decide whether an integer sequence defined by a linear recurrence never becomes negative?
Can a deterministic parallel algorithm find a perfect matching in every general graph with polylogarithmic time and polynomially many processors?
Can an algorithm efficiently determine, without random choices, whether an arithmetic circuit computes the zero polynomial?