The problem
All living branches of flowering plants, including grasses and oaks, trace back to their last common ancestor. When did it live? Dating that crown group requires distinguishing it from the earlier lineage leading to the ancestor, called the stem lineage, and from the first flower. Molecular clocks combine DNA change with fossil constraints because genetic differences alone do not separate time from changing rates of evolution. Fossil placement, missing sampling and model assumptions therefore matter. A 2025 analysis favored a largely Triassic crown age; a 2026 integration favored the younger latest Jurassic. Their different ways of using fossils leave a disagreement, not a final date.[1] [2] [3]
Scope
The age of the crown group of angiosperms: the most recent common ancestor of all living flowering plants and its descendants.
What remains open
The 2025 fossilized birth–death approach and 2026 fossil-calibration integration produce conflicting estimates. Neither is treated as final consensus.[1] [2]
Why it matters
These plants transformed land ecosystems. The age of their shared ancestor changes how much time their lineages had to diversify before the widespread flowering-plant ecosystems seen later in the fossil record.[3]
Definitions
3 terms
Crown group
The last common ancestor of all living members of a group, together with all of its descendants. Earlier ancestors leading to that ancestor are excluded.[1] [2]
Molecular clock
A dating approach using genetic changes and external time constraints, often fossils. Evolutionary rates can vary; DNA differences alone are not calendar dates.[1] [2]
Fossilized birth–death
A dating model representing how lineages form and go extinct, and how fossils are preserved and sampled. Its rates and other assumptions affect inferred tree ages.[1]
Sources
- New insights on angiosperm crown age based on Bayesian node dating and skyline fossilized birth-death approaches
Notes on New insights on angiosperm crown age based on Bayesian node dating and skyline fossilized birth-death approaches
Primary dating study compares fossil-calibration approaches and favors a largely Triassic crown age. Its account explains rate/time and fossil-constraint dependence; this is an inferred age of the living crown, not the first flower or a final consensus.
- Integrated analysis of fossils and molecular divergence time estimates a latest Jurassic origin of angiosperms
Notes on Integrated analysis of fossils and molecular divergence time estimates a latest Jurassic origin of angiosperms
Primary integration of fossil occurrences and molecular dates favors a latest-Jurassic crown under its preferred calibration strategy. Other strategies yield older results; the disagreement with the 2025 analysis remains explicit and neither is final consensus.
- Phylogenomics and the rise of the angiosperms
Notes on Phylogenomics and the rise of the angiosperms
Primary phylogenomic study connects the flowering-plant tree with ecological and diversification history. Its fossil-calibrated trees use alternative crown-age constraints, illustrating why present DNA and incomplete fossils do not supply one automatic date.