The problem
A solid-state nuclear clock uses the frequency at which thorium-229 nuclei in a calcium-fluoride crystal respond to light as its reference. The question is how accurately that frequency can be known after accounting for shifts caused by the crystal and its surroundings. The specific engineering target is a validated total systematic fractional uncertainty near : an uncertainty in the corrected frequency of roughly one part in a billion billion.
For this platform, the published zero-slope working temperature is . Temperature co-sensing is projected to suppress that contribution below the target, without yet establishing the full uncertainty budget.[1] [2]
Scope
A thorium-229 nuclear clock in a CaF2 solid-state host with an experimentally substantiated total systematic fractional-frequency uncertainty of 10^-18 or below. Distinguish accuracy from averaging stability and cross-crystal reproducibility; this is a specific host/platform target, not first nuclear excitation or first feedback operation.
What remains open
Characterize strain and spatial inhomogeneity, Zeeman effects, line selection and interrogation-dependent shifts through controlled perturbations and independent clock comparisons. The measured reproducibility and a feedback clock’s near- day-scale instability quantify different limits; neither is a total accuracy result.[1] [2] [3]
Why it matters
A substantiated budget would make residual drift interpretable as a metrological or physical signal rather than an unknown host-crystal effect. The nuclear reference’s sensitivity to fundamental interactions becomes useful only after ordinary environmental shifts can be separated from such signals.[1] [2] [3]
Research directions
2 directions to explore
Host-crystal shifts
Quantify spatial strain, temperature, magnetic and defect-related frequency shifts.
Total uncertainty budget
Validate all systematic corrections and their combined uncertainty by perturbation tests and independent comparisons.
Definitions
3 terms
fractional uncertainty
Uncertainty expressed relative to the reference frequency. A value of corresponds to roughly one part in a billion billion; the total requires accounting for all relevant shifts.[1] [2] [3]
Sources
Partial results
A temperature-insensitive working point and multi-month crystal reproducibility were measured. Scope: Thorium-229 doped CaF2 crystals.
The projection concerns temperature alone. Reproducibility is approximately 1.1×10^-13; remaining systematics are not a demonstrated 10^-18 total budget.
Source date: 2026-01-28At 195 K, two differently doped crystals reproduce within 220 Hz over seven months; temperature co-sensing motivates a below-10^-18 projection.Read the source ↗A solid-state nuclear clock operated with laser feedback. Scope: A room-temperature Th-229:CaF2 experimental clock.
Measured frequency changes across illuminated locations; averaging stability does not establish total accuracy.
Source date: 2026-06-03June 2026 preprint demonstrates locking and long averaging runs.Read the source ↗- A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop
Notes on A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop
Primary working crystal clock with feedback measures averaging stability and position-dependent shifts; it does not report a total 10^-18 accuracy budget.
- Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks
Notes on Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks
Published experiment finds a temperature-insensitive working point and 220 Hz reproducibility over seven months. Its below-10^-18 projection applies to temperature, not all systematic shifts.
- Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks (author preprint)
Notes on Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks (author preprint)
Accessible experimental main text discusses inhomogeneous broadening, crystal stress and uncharacterized magnetic shifts. Superseded numerical reproducibility is not used.