Solid-state nuclear clock accuracy

Still openEvidence checked

Subjects: Quantum physics · Electronic devices

Collections: Electronics and photonics

Reading depth

The problem

A clock can use a nucleus’s resonant transition as its reference. Thorium-229 nuclei embedded in a crystal are now driven by a laser, with feedback keeping the laser on resonance. The engineering challenge is to know the reference frequency accurately.[1] [2]

Scope

A thorium-229 nuclear clock in a CaF2 solid-state host with an experimentally substantiated total systematic fractional-frequency uncertainty of 10^-18 or below. Distinguish accuracy from averaging stability and cross-crystal reproducibility; this is a specific host/platform target, not first nuclear excitation or first feedback operation.

What remains open

The crystal environment can shift the resonance. Averaging a noisy measurement longer does not remove a steady shift caused by temperature, strain or magnetic fields. Those shifts must be measured, controlled and included in the clock’s uncertainty.[1] [2] [3]

Why it matters

A crystal holds many nuclei in a small volume, offering an attractive clock platform. Demonstrating that different conditions give the same corrected frequency would turn a sharp resonance into a dependable measurement standard.[1] [2] [3]

Research directions

2 directions to explore

Definitions

3 terms
fractional uncertainty

Uncertainty expressed relative to the reference frequency. A value of 10−1810^{-18} corresponds to roughly one part in a billion billion; the total requires accounting for all relevant shifts.[1] [2] [3]

instability

How repeated frequency readings fluctuate over a stated averaging time. Small fluctuations can coexist with an unknown steady displacement of the reference frequency.[1] [2]

systematic shifts

Changes in the measured reference caused by effects such as temperature, strain or magnetic fields. Their corrections and remaining uncertainties must enter the accuracy budget.[1] [2] [3]

Sources

Partial results
T. Ooi, J. F. Doyle, C. Zhang, J. S. Higgins, J. Ye, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky and T. Schumm

A temperature-insensitive working point and multi-month crystal reproducibility were measured. Scope: Thorium-229 doped CaF2 crystals.

The projection concerns temperature alone. Reproducibility is approximately 1.1×10^-13; remaining systematics are not a demonstrated 10^-18 total budget.

Source date: 2026-01-28At 195 K, two differently doped crystals reproduce within 220 Hz over seven months; temperature co-sensing motivates a below-10^-18 projection.Read the source ↗
L. Toscani De Col and colleagues

A solid-state nuclear clock operated with laser feedback. Scope: A room-temperature Th-229:CaF2 experimental clock.

Measured frequency changes across illuminated locations; averaging stability does not establish total accuracy.

Source date: 2026-06-03June 2026 preprint demonstrates locking and long averaging runs.Read the source ↗
  1. A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop L. Toscani De Col and colleagues · 2026-06-03
    Notes on A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop

    Primary working crystal clock with feedback measures averaging stability and position-dependent shifts; it does not report a total 10^-18 accuracy budget.

  2. Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks T. Ooi, J. F. Doyle, C. Zhang, J. S. Higgins, J. Ye, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky and T. Schumm · 2026-01-28
    Notes on Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks

    Published experiment finds a temperature-insensitive working point and 220 Hz reproducibility over seven months. Its below-10^-18 projection applies to temperature, not all systematic shifts.

  3. Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks (author preprint) T. Ooi and colleagues · 2025-07-01
    Notes on Frequency reproducibility of solid-state thorium-229 nuclear clocks (author preprint)

    Accessible experimental main text discusses inhomogeneous broadening, crystal stress and uncharacterized magnetic shifts. Superseded numerical reproducibility is not used.

Related problems

Suggest a correction